View all of David's updates Kontained: 3 months ago

Where is video in 2010?

description of image

This Thursday 22nd, I will be at the Akamai 2009 Global Customer Conference in Boston. At 1pm, I will be part of a panel that includes Adobe, American Idol and I will represent Fi to discuss "Building and Creating Video Players Usability, Design and Open Standards" as part of the "internet revolution continues" conference.

 

I will showcase some of Fi's new work and answer questions from the audience as well as debate among the panelists; what video should be in 2010. I would love to hear opinions of what you think about the topic that I can voice on your behalf at the conference. What is key to building or designing a video player in your amazing project? What’s next?

Share this entry

Close
Invalid e-mail format, please try again

Your friends will be notified via email about this entry.

Remove Email

You are about to remove the selected emails from your list. Are you sure you want to remove them?

Yes
Cancel
Select All Deselect All Remove Selected

Share with third party communities This will take you to a new window.


Report Inappropriate Content

Close
Details
Operations

Thank You!

The safety and legitimacy of Kontain's content is paramount to us. We will be investigating this content shortly. Here is what you reported:

Report Category Harmful of Dangerous Acts Report Detail Drug Abuse
Additional Information

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetuer adipiscing elit penubrum purous

Comments (7)

  • SNDKno 3 months ago

    One ting that have been annoying me. Might not be spot on but anyhow. My oldest daughter has the new Sony Vaio P series and even with 2GB of ram it cant play Youtube videos in full Screen. Is this 2009???

     

    PS: See the PW. A bit Apple looky? ;-)

  • kevin 3 months ago

    Personally I would love to see continued support for open standards around video.One key factor of HTML5 is that it's <video&g; element was initially meant to have native support for the OGG codec. This has since been removed from the actual HTML5 spec, however many browsers are supporting it nonetheless. The key thing here is that we are no longer dependent on software from Adobe (Flash) or Apple (Quicktime) to embed movies directly into HTML.

     

    Undoubtedly, Adobe would love to hold on to FLV for as long as possible (and rightfully so—it compresses very nicely), but perhaps they would be willing to lend support to this for HTML to embed the FLV file format without the need for a Flash wrapper?

  • kevin 3 months ago

    So I suppose to sum up: what's next should involve moving away from a reliance on third-party video technology.

     

  • SNDKno 3 months ago

    I agree with Kevin. I hope Adobe continue the H264 Support.

    Adobe to work more close with Apple and not stand to firm on their own horse. QT and Flash is for me the choice of video online when it comes to video in web browser. Another ting that I would love to see in Flash is if Flash video Full Screen would stay full screen even if you use another program on another screen like QT and WMP does.

     

  • kevin 3 months ago

    Performance is another big thing, but that's typically going to leave us at the mercy of the end-user's computer. Seriously though, why the hell can't I create a Flash site that has a 1900x1200 video running in the background? I mean really—this is 2010. I can live without a flying car for now, but can you at least give me fullscreen video that doesn't destroy the users' experience with the rest of my site?

     

    Front-end developers shouldn't even have to think about the implications of using video and have to waste time with export settings, streaming vs. progressive vs. faked streaming, etc.. I should be able to drop a video in and not be the least bit concerned about video chugging or slowing down the rest of the site for the user. This is a problem even if the video is completely loaded.

     

    Then there's also the case of a video not being loaded and still being downloaded. We need to address this on a micro level of continued codec improvement (getting the files smaller), or on a macro level of improving our communication infrastructure to get faster internet speeds (making the tubes bigger). As technology evolves, designers and developers only push it further, which works great for companies like Adobe and their community, but I feel that the hardware is much more difficult to bring into this loop.

     

  • Jens Fischer 3 months ago

    While Kevin of course is right, that we must not forget about how many performance issues we still have, I would have to say that from an interaction design standpoint I think that video as a technology is already ahead of our perception of it at the moment.

    Video has transformed into a digital medium a long time ago, but we don't always seem to be fully aware of that yet in the ways we interact with it. Video is not a reel or film spool anymore, that once it has been recorded stays the same forever, with a clear beginning and ending. I think video should and will lose its linearity. It can have dynamic elements and layers, like for example injecting today's news show into a TV in a movie that has been filmed years ago to make it appear like it plays in present day. It can have branches of content, so each time you watch a movie it might have a different storyline. It could have different camera angles, so while you're watching a movie you could switch to a different view of the same story. None of those ideas are really new nor do they make sense for all situations and concepts, but I think it's just sad that the way we treat the video in our video players didn't change in any drastic way since it first appeared. Sure it looks crisper than ever, but I think what we need above all are artists and designers who bring video to its next level by creating a new and improved interaction with it, beyond play button and progress bar.

     

  • acefx 3 months ago

    Hey Dave,

    Glad to hear that. But is the video video platform relating to people in countries where bandwidth is like gold.

    Maybe a better streamlining video platform with low bandwidth idea....

     

    Think of it

     

What do you think?

Collapse

Friends / Following

Loading…
  1. minthu

    Min Thu


    20 Updates Updated: 1 hour ago
  2. nuevecerouno

    nuevecerouno


    9 Updates Updated: 2 hours ago
  3. firdosht

    Firdosh Tangri


    62 Updates Updated: 6 hours ago
  4. nixwebo

    Nick Simpson


    17 Updates Updated: 7 hours ago
  5. ID Kasia

    Kasia Zwierzycki


    44 Updates Updated: 13 hours ago
Collapse

More from David

Subscribe to David

Feeds are an easy way to stay up-to-date with websites you love. Feeds automatically update and show you the newest content without you having to check. Read more here.

All you need is a Feed Reader, like these free ones for Mac and PC.

Close
Collapse

Featured Kontainers

Copyright © 2010 Kontain LLC. All rights reserved